Pilot 1 can answer
Which companies warrant internal review?
Public evidence · external opportunity score · source-linked dossiers · human portfolio decision
Independent proposal for Real Chemistry · Pilot 1 concept
See the opportunity
before it becomes
an ordinary pursuit.
Inflection Radar proposes a way to turn permitted public evidence into a human-reviewed portfolio of emerging neuropsychiatry companies for internal consideration—without requiring production integration or internal data.
- 8 weeks
- Proposed engagement
- 50–75
- Proposed research universe
- 12–15
- Proposed reviewed accounts
A visible reasoning chain
Every transition preserves source, confidence, restrictions, contradictions, and human authority.
Start with your question
What do you need to decide?
Select a path. The page will prioritize the material most relevant to that decision; nothing is hidden.
Recommended pathProposal → Pilot → Decision
Begin this path
The proposal
One external question.
One protected boundary.
Pilot 1 identifies companies that appear externally attractive for Real Chemistry review. It does not decide which companies Real Chemistry should pursue.
Protected boundary
Only Real Chemistry can answer
Which are plausible internal pursuits?
Clients · conflicts · relationships · economics · ownership · capacity · prior pursuits
Proposed next stepReview an eight-week Discover pilot
Not required nowANATOMI, CRM, internal data, production engineering
Inspectable method
Evidence never silently becomes a conclusion.
Select each stage to see what changes, what must remain attached to the record, and who has authority.
Model-task portfolio
Provider-flexible. Never model-indifferent.
Interactive decision room
Test the method rather than taking it on faith.
This illustrative company is not a real recommendation. Change the weights to see how the external score and review disposition respond.
Illustrative account
Aperture Neuro
74/ 100
Current dispositionADVANCE TO HUMAN REVIEW
Evidence strength and timing currently drive the result.
Sample dossier
Evidence before interpretation
Observed fact
Company announces Phase 2 initiation through a first-party release; trial registry record is present.
Analytical inference
A more complex stakeholder and evidence environment may be emerging.
Unresolved
Public evidence cannot establish an agency need, relationship, conflict, or pursuit.
- Evidence tier
- Corroborated finding
- Sources
- First-party release + ClinicalTrials.gov
- Rights
- Publicly accessible; link and limited extraction permitted for research
- Contradiction review
- No conflict found; registry status requires recheck before circulation
- Human gate
- Account review required before any disposition
Governance by design
Permission is a lifecycle, not a label.
Select a source class to trace what may happen from acquisition through retention. Derived intelligence does not shed its upstream restrictions.
- Decision and use-case definition
- Source acquisition
- Rights and permissions
- Data engineering and security
- Retrieval and provenance
- Analysis and model orchestration
- Human validation and compliance
- Output, action, and monitoring
- Source approval
- Record validation
- Analytical approval
- Account review
- Distribution approval
- Verified fact
- Corroborated finding
- Analytical inference
- Hypothesis or early signal
Proposed eight-week execution
Each proposed week ends with a reviewable object.
Select a week to inspect the proposed activities, output, dependency, and gate. These are planned deliverables, not evidence of a completed pilot.
Capability fit
The proposed white space is an operating layer.
Public evidence supports nearly all ingredients. It does not publicly establish this exact upstream growth workflow. “Not publicly evidenced” never means “does not exist.”
Confirmed ingredients
- ANATOMI ecosystem
- Analytics & Insights
- HealthGEO and ReputAI
- Medical, communications, access, media
- Growth and revenue leadership
Inflection RadarOrganizes external evidence around prospective-account review
Internally unknown
- Prospect discovery workflow
- Growth-facing ANATOMI use
- Target-account score
- Conflict and ownership routing
- Outcome-linked learning
One system · distinct reading modes
Choose the object that fits the moment.
Each file has its own job. Preview the purpose and reading time before opening or downloading.
Executive brief
The decision, direct diligence responses, scope, boundaries, and immediate ask.
Internal report
The authoritative method, governance, scoring, validation, capability fit, and appendices.
Discussion deck
A 16:9 PowerPoint built to guide the live decision and preserve detail in speaker notes.
Discussion requested
Review the proposed Pilot 1 scope and four minimal inputs.
- Scope
- Intended reader
- Public service priorities
- Success standard